Justice Reinvestment Act – Contents

Justice Reinvestment Act of 2016

Senate Bill 1005

How to read a bill

Pages Subject
5-8 Purpose Statement
11-14 Statutory Sections Modified
15-103 Deleted text of prior bill draft
104-105 Inmate Risk and Needs Assessments to Focus Corrections Programs and Treatments – Correctional Services (CS) Art., § 3-601
105-108 Credits Towards Sentences for Recidivism Reduction Programs – CS Art., § 3-705 to 708, effective for inmates sentenced after 10/1/17 (pg. 204)
108-109 Definitions Including “Risk Factor”, “Risk Needs Assessment (RNA),” and “Technical Violation” – CS Art., §6-101
109-111 All Offenders Screened for “Risk Level”; Use of Risk Needs Assessment – CS Art., §6-104 & 6-111
111-113 Individuals May Earn Early “Abatement” of Supervision by “Compliance Credits” – CS Art., §6-117
113-114 “Evidence-Based” and Innovative Corrections Programs – CS Art., §6-119
114 Annual training for all parole & prob.staff on risk factors, interventions & behavior mgt.
114-115 Administrative “Graduated Sanctions” for “Technical Violations” – CS Art., §6-121
116-118 Certificates of Rehabilitation – CS Art., §7-104
120-123 “Administrative Release” to Parole for Certain “Low Risk” Inmates – CS Art., §7-301.1
124-127 Medical Parole for Certain Debilitated Or Incapacitated Inmates – CS Art., § 7-309
127-131 Limited Incarceration for Parole “Technical Violations” with Public Safety / Victim Exception – CS Art., §7-401 & 7-504
 132-133 Restitution Withheld from Inmate Earnings – CS Art., §9-614
135-136 Increases in Penalties for Violent Crimes Including 2nd Degree Murder, child abuse causing death,  – Criminal Law (CL) Art., §2-204, 3-601, and —
136-144 Penalties Reduced for Various Drug Offenses – CL Art., §5-601 through 5-609 with presumption in favor of drug assessment and treatment for users.
145-146 Permits Possible Retroactive Reduction of Certain Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentences – CL Art., §5-609.1
146-147 Equalizes Penalties for Possessing Larger Quantities of Crack and Powder Cocaine – CL Art., §5-612
147-148 Provides that enhanced penalty for drug distribution is available only for those also convicted of “crime of violence.” – CL Art., sec. 5-905.
148-163 Reduces Misdemeanor Theft Penalties & Makes Same Reductions for Other Theft-Related Offenses That Involve Use of Checks, Credit Cards, Receiving Stolen Property, Medical Services, Etc. – CL Art., §7-104, 7-108, 8-106, 8-206, 8-207, 8-209, 8-301, 8-516, 8-611, and 8-801
163-168 Extends criminal gang offenses to include drug-related offenses, to increase penalties, and to provide for forfeiture of profits. CL Art., sec. 9-801 through 9-807.
168-170 Provides that an inmate, convicted of a “crime of violence,” is eligible for parole at age 60 if he has served at least 15 years.
170-172 Violations of Probation – Definitions – Criminal Procedure (CP) Art., §1-101
172-175 Limited Incarceration for Parole “Technical Violations” with Public Safety / Victim Exception –CP Art., §6-223 and 6-224.
176-179 Expungement of  Designated Misdemeanors – CP Art., §10-110
180-181 Distribution to victims under Crim.Injury Compensation Fund- CP Art., sec.11-819
181-184 Substance Abuse Assessments and Treatment for Offenders – Health-General (HG) Art., §8-505 and 8-507 provides “immediate” treatment within 30 days from court order
184-185 Provides a nonlapsing  “Addiction Treatment Divestiture Fund.” HG Art., sec. 8-6D-01.
185-186, 195-196 State Finance & Procurement Article (SFP)- §6-226 Establishes A Special, Nonlapsing, Interest Accruing Performance Incentive County Grant Fund [“The Grant Fund”]
186-194 State Government (SG) Article –  §9–3201  and  following sections establish Justice Reinvestment Oversight Board (JROB), Membership and Duties
197-198 Local Govt. Justice Reinvestment Commission Is Established – SG Art., §9-3211
198 Justice Reinvestment Oversight Board Reports Annually, Eff. 12/31/17 – SG Art., §9-3212
198-200 First offenders for driving suspended shall not be incarcerated, but subject only to a fine. Transportation Art., sec. 27-101 (gg).
200-201 State Shall Annually Evaluate Any Gap in Offender Treatment Needs and Available Services, Eff. December 31, 2016 – (uncodified)
201 Maryland Mediation and Conflict Resolution Office (MACRO) Shall Study and Identify Best Practices for Criminal Referrals to Mediation, Eff. 1/1/17 – (uncodified)
201 State Commission on Criminal Sentencing Policy Shall Study How More Alternatives to Incarceration may be Included in the Sentencing Guidelines and Shall Offer Recommendations – (uncodified)
201-201 State agencies shall study barriers  for those with criminal records as to employment, licensing and entrepreneurship and shall report findings and recommendations by 12/31/16.
203-204 Governor’s Office of Crime Control & Prevention (GOCCP) Shall Study and Propose a Plan to Improve Restitution Collection – (uncodified)
204 Local Correction Facilities and State Health Dept. Shall Study & Report Budget Requirements for Plans to Treat Drug Offenders Locally – (uncodified)
204 Effective Dates for Different Parts of Justice Reinvestment Act – most substantive & procedural provisions (pages 104-186 and 198-200) have a delayed effective date of 10/1/17, but new Boards are appointed and most requirements for continued research and recommendations (pages 200-204) as to restitution collection, unmet treatment needs, criminal mediation, sentencing guidelines for alternatives to incarceration, and reimbursement / funding for local detention centers all take effect 10/1/16 with various subsequent report and fund allocation dates in later years.

The analysis above is based on the original SB1005 dated 5/19/2016.

To see the current text of this legislation go to:
http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2016RS/bills/sb/sb1005e.pdf

To view the Maryland Alliance for Justice Reform summary page go to:
https://www.ma4jr.org/jra-summary/

To view the Maryland Alliance for Justice Reform’s index to the JRA:
https://www.ma4jr.org/jra-index/

To see the legislative initiatives of the Maryland Alliance for Justice Reform:
https://www.ma4jr.org/initiatives/

To get further information about the Maryland Alliance for Justice Reform:
https://www.ma4jr.org/

————————

Maryland Alliance for Justice Reform (MAJR) played a central 2015 role in advocating and supporting efforts to pass the Justice Reinvestment initiative in Maryland. While the 2016 JRA bill is not perfect from MAJR’s viewpoint, its many important reforms could reduce Maryland’s prison population by 16% and save $270 million within 10 years. By reinvesting those funds in alternatives to incarceration, our state’s crime rate also could be reduced, taxpayer funds could be saved, while communities and families are strengthened.

MAJR is a nonpartisan association of over thirty community organizations and churches with members in every part of the state, formed to support justice reinvestment. Individual supporters include judges, attorneys, corrections professionals, as well as returning citizens, victims, and service providers.